With all of the excitement and speculation around the outcome of a particular experience, it’s easy to get carried away. But with any initiative, it’s crucial to consider each initiative’s estimated impact (from costs to potential excitement generated) and effort (which teams will need to be involved) before pulling the trigger. Otherwise, you can end up wasting valuable time and energy on unrealistic campaigns or those that offer little or no value to the business — both of which can hurt the long-term sustainability of a personalization program.
The rating system below should be used to aid the decision-making process, ensuring you are able to maximize each campaign.
Impact:
Rated holistically, can be measured by High, Medium or Low.
- Alignment with company objectives
- Legal and privacy considerations
- Estimate time to impact
- Effect on the purchase funnel
- Level of excitement generated
- Endorsement by an executive sponsor
- Ability to reduce costs
Effort:
Rated holistically, can be measured by High, Medium or Low.
- Teams involved
- Code or test complexity
- Test definition
- Time to QA
Once you evaluate each test, use this as a simple North Star:
- High impact + Low effort = Do it now
- High impact + High effort = Plan for the long-term
- Low impact + Low effort = Plan for a quick win
- Low impact + High effort = Drop
Eventually, you’ll end up with a scorecard for which campaigns to prioritize. Prioritizing these tests is key to reducing design and development cycles for the quick and effective implementation of campaigns. If the scope of an experiment doesn’t line up with the testing schedule, deadlines are bound to get missed and the user information associated with a campaign will go stale, resulting in lower-impact results. Not to mention, a poor customer experience.
Then, the building officially begins.